Posted by: mylifenet on: March 12, 2011
Dear Honorable Secretary General Ban Ki–Moon.
A 9-year-old resident of the Orta Garvand village in the Agdam region (Azerbaijan) was killed on March 8, 2011 as a result of a ceasefire violation by Armenian troops. Fariz Badalov was wounded in the head by shots from Armenian-occupied village of Shikhlar while playing in the yard of his house.
He was taken to hospital, but doctors failed to save his life.
The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988 when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992, including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.
Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. – are currently holding the peace negotiations.
Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding regions.
The violation of the ceasefire by the Armenian side is no longer surprising. In the last month, Armenian occupying troops broke this fragile regime more than 50 times, killing two Azerbaijani soldiers and wounding two more in February alone. The same number suffered and died in January.
But while it is possible to envisage soldiers’ dying on the front line, although this is with great sorrow, the death of a child from a sniper’s bullet is unacceptable, regardless of the state of the process to resolve the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.
We ask UN to place more pressure on Armenia to implement the U.N. Security Council’s four resolutions on the withdrawal of occupying forces from Azerbaijani territories.
Denmark Azerbaijan “Vatan” Society
11 March, 2011/ Hillerod, Denmark
veten_cemiyyeti@yahoo.dk
http://www.diaspora.gov.az/index.php?options=news&id=11&news_id=934
http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=142809
http://en.trend.az/news/karabakh/1845076.html
http://www.news.az/articles/society/32864
http://bit.ly/gRqjYM
Posted by: mylifenet on: February 26, 2011
A seminar entitled “Nagorno-Karabakh conflict” was held at the University of Southern Denmark on 24 February 2011.
The purpose of the seminar was to inform participants from Denmark and other countries about the background of the conflict, reasons it happened and its influence to the people living on that region. As the result of the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan 30.000 people were killed (5.000 Armenian and 25.000 Azerbaijani), nearly one million internally-displaced peoples (IDPs) and refugees posses Azerbaijan and 300.000 posses Armenia, occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions of Azerbaijan by Armenia. It was also stressed the most tragically event of the war – “Khojaly Massacre”, which took the lives of 613 civilians in 1992. Even though UN passed 4 resolutions demanding “unconditional withdrawal of occupation forces from all the occupied regions of the Azerbaijan Republic” the Republic of Armenia refused to comply with these demands.
There was online conference with Azerbaijani political analyst, co-founder of the Republicanist Alternative” (Re: AL!) movement Ilgar Mammadov. He suggested to focus on the future of the conflict and how it could be solved rather than concentrating on the historical origin of the Nagorno-Karabakh region.
The seminar proceeded with active discussion of parties and the exhibition of “Justice for Khojaly” campaign. At the end traditional Azerbaijani sweets were served to the guests.
Posted by: mylifenet on: February 26, 2011
This is the short presentation of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
It was first presented during the seminar entitled “Nagorno-Karabakh conflict” which was held at the University of Southern Denmark on 24 February 2011.
Presentation represents the background of the conflict, reasons it happened and its influence to the people living on that region.
Posted by: mylifenet on: February 16, 2011
THE SITUATION
In Washington , DC , at a Metro Station, on a cold January morning in 2007, this man with a violin played six Bach pieces for about 45 minutes. During that time, approximately 2,000 people went through the station, most of them on
their way to work.
After about 3 minutes, a middle-aged man noticed that there was a musician playing. He slowed his pace and stopped for a few seconds, and then he hurried on to meet his schedule.
About 4 minutes later:
The violinist received his first dollar. A woman threw money in the hat and, without stopping, continued to walk.
At 6 minutes:
A young man leaned against the wall to listen to him, then looked at his watch and started to walk again.
At 10 minutes:
A 3-year old boy stopped, but his mother tugged him along hurriedly. The kid stopped to look at the violinist again, but the mother pushed hard and the child continued to walk, turning his head the whole time. This action was repeated by several other children, but every parent – without exception – forced their children to move on quickly.
At 45 minutes:
The musician played continuously. Only 6 people stopped and listened for a short while. About 20 gave money but continued to walk at their normal pace. The man collected a total of $32.
After 1 hour:
He finished playing and silence took over. No one noticed and no one applauded. There was no recognition at all.
No one knew this, but the violinist was Joshua Bell, one of the greatest musicians in the world. He played one of the most intricate pieces ever written, with a violin worth $3.5 million dollars. Two days before, Joshua Bell sold-out a theater in Boston where the seats averaged $100 each to sit and listen to him play the same music.
This is a true story. Joshua Bell, playing incognito in the D.C. Metro Station, was organized by the Washington Post as part of a social experiment about perception, taste and people’s priorities.
This experiment raised several questions:
*In a common-place environment, at an inappropriate hour, do we perceive beauty?
*If so, do we stop to appreciate it?
*Do we recognize talent in an unexpected context?
One possible conclusion reached from this experiment could be this:
If we do not have a moment to stop and listen to one of the best musicians in the world, playing some of the finest music ever written, with one of the most beautiful instruments ever made . . ..
How many other things are we missing as we rush through life?
Enjoy life NOW .. it has an expiration date.
Posted by: mylifenet on: December 22, 2010
Halley’in Newton’la görüşməsi elmin tarixində ən vacib görüş hesab olunur. Gənc astronom Edmund Halley İsaac Newton’un yanına gəlib, sualını verməsəydi və cavabını təkidlə istəməsəydi, elmin və tarixin sonrakı inkişafı necə olardı, görəsən?
1684-cü ildə gənc astronom Edmund Halley İsaac Newton’dan soruşdu – Günəşə doğru cazibə gücün Günəşə qədər məsafənin kvadratına bərabər olan planetin orbiti nə şəkildədir? Newton dərhal cavab verdi: ”Ellips”. Düşünmədən verilmiş cavaba təəccüblənmiş Halley soruşdu: “Bunu hardan bildiniz?” Newton dedi: “Hesablamışam”.
Halley hesablamaları dərhal ona göstərilməsini xahiş etdi. Masanın üstündəki kağızların arasında hesablamaları axtardığını göstərməyə çalışan Newton, utanaraq dedi: “Nəsə tapa bilmirəm, görünür başqa yerdədir. Tapandan sonra Sizə göndərərəm”.
Newton yalan dedi, hesablaması heç yox idi. Cavabını bədahətən verib. Nəticəyə sübutsuz vardığını etiraf etməyə utandığından hesablamalarının guya oldğunu, amma tapa bilmədiyini deməli oldu. Sonra Halley’in sualını cavabsız qoymamaq üçün hesablamalarına başlayıb.
Nəticədə, doğrudan da ellips alınıb. Newton’un intuitiv cavabı yekunda doğru çıxdı. Amma, hesablama 18 ay çəkdi və üç cildlik əsərə çevrildi – “Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica” (“Təbiət Fəlsəfəsinin Riyazi Prinsipləri).
Comments